The Patent Shoppe
  • Home
  • Firm Information
    • Areas of Practice
    • Firm Philosophy
    • Services and Pricing
  • Personnel
    • Patrick J. Lavender
  • Insight
  • Links
  • Contact Us

Do U.S. Patent Examiners ever utilize improper tactics to reject patent applications?

6/4/2017

 
Yes.  For example, some U.S. Patent Examiners will glom onto irrelevant/non-precedential court cases handed down by the Federal Circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court (i.e., cases that were especially damning to the patent owner or patent Applicant) and cite those cases as authoritative, despite glaring differences in the fact-patterns and/or legal issues presented.

In fact, this was happening so often with respect to the non-precedential decisions Smartgene, Cyberphone, and Planet Bingo that the U.S. Patent Office had to issue a memo cautioning Examiners to rely on such cases.

That November 2, 2016 memo states:

"Non-precedential decisions: Finally, given the large and ever-increasing number of precedential decisions, examiners should avoid relying upon or citing non-precedential decisions (e.g., SmartGene, Cyberfone) unless the facts of the application under examination uniquely match the facts at issue in the non-precedential decision. The updated chart of court decisions available on the USPTO' s SME Webpage indicates whether a decision is precedential or non precedential."

More information on this can be found at the Bilski Blog at Fenwick West:

www.bilskiblog.com/blog/2017/06/examiner-citations-of-smartgene-cyberfone-drop-after-mcro-memo.html#page=1


Comments are closed.

    Insight
    ( Official Blog )

    RSS Feed

© COPYRIGHT 2015, THE PATENT SHOPPE. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS WEBSITE IS PUBLISHED BY THE LAW FIRM THE PATENT SHOPPE. ITS CONTENTS ARE NOT INTENDED TO SERVE AS LEGAL ADVICE OR LEGAL OPINION. SUCH ADVICE MAY ONLY BE PROVIDED WHEN RELATED TO SPECIFIC FACT SITUATIONS THAT THE PATENT SHOPPE HAS BEEN RETAINED AS COUNSEL TO ADDRESS.