Under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f)(1) and (2), one can infringe a U.S. patent based on activity occurring out of the U.S. in two instances. The referenced statute reads in relevant part:
(1) Whoever without authority supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States all or a substantial portion of the components of a patented invention, where such components are uncombined in whole or in part, in such manner as to actively induce the combination of such components outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States, shall be liable as an infringer.
(2) Whoever without authority supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States any component of a patented invention that is especially made or especially adapted for use in the invention and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use, where such component is uncombined in whole or in part, knowing that such component is so made or adapted and intending that such component will be combined outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States, shall be liable as an infringer.
Note that "substantial portion" was recently ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court to require more than one component in the case of Life Techs. Corp. v. Promega Corp., Slip. No. 14-1538 (U.S. Feb. 22, 2017).
(1) Whoever without authority supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States all or a substantial portion of the components of a patented invention, where such components are uncombined in whole or in part, in such manner as to actively induce the combination of such components outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States, shall be liable as an infringer.
(2) Whoever without authority supplies or causes to be supplied in or from the United States any component of a patented invention that is especially made or especially adapted for use in the invention and not a staple article or commodity of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use, where such component is uncombined in whole or in part, knowing that such component is so made or adapted and intending that such component will be combined outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States, shall be liable as an infringer.
Note that "substantial portion" was recently ruled by the U.S. Supreme Court to require more than one component in the case of Life Techs. Corp. v. Promega Corp., Slip. No. 14-1538 (U.S. Feb. 22, 2017).
RSS Feed